Weighted Score:
65
High sovereignty due to European-controlled; not EU-anchored and Swiss law; US footprint exists.

Company name: pCloud International AG
URL: https://www.pcloud.com
eurotechguide review(s): Not reviewed

Digital services offered: Cloud drive
Criterion Score Short Assessment Long Rationale
SOV-1 (strategic) 3 European-controlled; not EU-anchored. pCloud is legally Switzerland-based, its services uses data centres in Luxembourg and the United States. Under SOV-1, governance is European, but not EU-anchored and the operational footprint is not purely EU. This is meaningfully European control, but not “complete EU control” (SEAL-4) and not fully EU ecosystem anchoring. → SEAL-3 fits best.
SOV-2 (legal) 3 Swiss law applies; EU only datacenters is a choice. Switzerland is outside EU law, although closely aligned. Customers can choose EU datacenters. EU law can apply to EU customers, but the provider is not “subject only to EU law.” → SEAL-3
SOV-3 (data & AI) 3 European hosting SOV-3 requires confinement of storage/processing to European jurisdictions with no fallback to third countries. Customers can choose regions, including Europe –> SEAL-3
SOV-4 (operational) 3 Operated by provider; not autonomous. Operates its own service and infrastructure. However, EU actors cannot independently operate or replicate the service stack without the vendor. → SEAL-3
SOV-5 (supply chain) 2 Global hardware + non-EU facility. Semiconductor and firmware supply chains are global, representing a material non-EU dependency. → SEAL-2.
SOV-6 (technological) 2 Proprietary; limited auditability. pCloud is largely proprietary; audit/modify/redistribute rights are limited. While it exposes standard interfaces, the framework’s technology sovereignty emphasizes openness and EU actors’ ability to evolve solutions without lock-in. This aligns to partial sovereignty with material dependency on vendor → SEAL-2.
SOV-7 (security) 3 Decent security; not EU-exclusive. pCloud publishes security posture and certifications (e.g., 2 Limited sustainability transparency No strong, quantified sustainability reporting on energy sourcing, emissions or lifecycle targets. Environmental governance maturity not demonstrated. → SEAL-2

The scoring is done according to the Cloud Sovereignty Framework (v1.2.1 , October 2025). The scores are determined based on publicly available information, but something may have been missed. In case you want to challenge the score or submit a new digital service, click here